Direct preservation/smoking method has been done traditionally to inhibit the growth of fungi during drying and also storage of copra. By this method copra has black or brown black in color because of the deposit of tar and the smoke fl avor is too strong, and the process can caused air pollution. The aim of this research was to know the differences of pirolisate infl uence and redistilate liquid smoke of coconut shell in depressing growth of fungi during drying, dose determines and soaking time of fresh coconut and to know infl uence liquid smoke of coconut shell to copra quality and coconut oil. The quality of coconut was uniform and classifi ed as grade A quality. This research consisted of 3 factors, that was : type of liquid smoke (pirolisat and redistilat), smoke dose (2 %, 6 %, and 10 %), soaking time (5, 10, and 15 minutes). Then by contrast is applied control treatment without soaking with liquid smoke. Copra which have low level of fungi attack and control were extracted for oil that analyzed for its. The result of fungi attack indicated as follows; soaking with pirolisate highest attack 31,4 % (treatment 2 %, 5 minute), and low of 0 % (treatment 30 %, 15 minutes; and 10 %, 30 minutes); while soaking with redistilate highest attack 34,72 % (treatment of 2 %, 30 minutes), and low of 0 % (treatment of 10 %, 15 minutes; and 10 %, 30 minutes). At contamination average control of fungi attack is 80,85 %. The result of coconut oil showing that treatment applied in the redistilate liquid smoke from coconut shell with 10 % concentration and 30 minutes soaking time showed better result compared to control and other treatment with water content 2.45 %; free fatty acid contents 0.26 %; peroxide number 0.31 meg/kg; specifi c weight of 0.9130, refractive index 1.452, and color scale 0.7.